<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Drummers Ain&#8217;t Stupid&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bigdrumthump.com/drummers-aint-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bigdrumthump.com/drummers-aint-stupid/</link>
	<description>Drum and Drummer News and Photos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SFL		</title>
		<link>https://bigdrumthump.com/drummers-aint-stupid/#comment-17</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SFL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigdrumthump.com/drummers-aint-stupid/#comment-17</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes and no. I think the important part here is the idea that &quot;those who best held a steady beat&quot; performed better on intelligence tests. So although other musicians in a band hopefully have some ability to keep time (yes, even a vocalist), it&#039;s generally a given that the drummer is the best timekeeper in a group and thus is the smartest of the bunch (if we&#039;re going to give any credence to the study, that is).  But, yeah, you&#039;re right: the implication is also that musicians are smarter than non-musicians. Wonder what Einstein would have to say about that? :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and no. I think the important part here is the idea that &#8220;those who best held a steady beat&#8221; performed better on intelligence tests. So although other musicians in a band hopefully have some ability to keep time (yes, even a vocalist), it&#8217;s generally a given that the drummer is the best timekeeper in a group and thus is the smartest of the bunch (if we&#8217;re going to give any credence to the study, that is).  But, yeah, you&#8217;re right: the implication is also that musicians are smarter than non-musicians. Wonder what Einstein would have to say about that? 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daggsy		</title>
		<link>https://bigdrumthump.com/drummers-aint-stupid/#comment-16</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daggsy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigdrumthump.com/drummers-aint-stupid/#comment-16</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That doesn&#039;t really add up though, does it? That just proves that people with a good sense of rhythm are smarter, but there aren&#039;t many places in a band for people who can&#039;t keep time.
I mean, even the vocallist is encouraged to have at least a passing glance to the tempo of the music now and again.
Isn&#039;t the study basically saying that all musicians are smarter than people who aren&#039;t musically talented?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t really add up though, does it? That just proves that people with a good sense of rhythm are smarter, but there aren&#8217;t many places in a band for people who can&#8217;t keep time.<br />
I mean, even the vocallist is encouraged to have at least a passing glance to the tempo of the music now and again.<br />
Isn&#8217;t the study basically saying that all musicians are smarter than people who aren&#8217;t musically talented?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
